Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 24 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
w.' '■¿■■".-rv’ ••‘iMS’1.- /; ; >^r _ • U M4VWV «■w* - «% -u jv^-t1 ii.t,u. 1'juiLuMwmj!1 e:: 11'i^iin iptipiÿiiipi T H E B E S S SERVING THE WARWICK AREA FOR NEARLY A CENTURY 100th Year ESTABLISHED APRIL, 1877, AS THE SUNBEAM I CONSOLIDATED WITH THE LITITZ RECORD, 1937) Lititz, Lancaster County, PA 17543, Thursday, April 29,1976 10 CENTS A COPT; $4.00 PER TEAR BT MAIL WITHIN LANCASTER COUNTT 24 PAGES-No. 6 Warwick Twp. Still On Fence Over Wage Tax : ? T ^ r A ’ H i ' ' 1 * } . *1. ¡ m ! f S i ' E S « I S S S 5 By Bonnie Szymanski The bimonthly meeting of the Warwick Township supervisors had been in session only twenty minutes Thursday night when one of the several citizens gathered in the township municipal building asked the question that was on everyone’s mind: What is the township supervisors’ opinion of taking one hall of the one percent wage tax from the school district? And more to the point: What action is being taken at this time? Although the wage tax question had been scheduled for discussion later in the evening under new business, tiie supervisors willingly set aside protocol and opened the floor to discussion of the wage tax controversy. “First of all,” explained Bill Dusslnger, chairman of the board of supervisors, “we haven’t decided on the full one half percent; we lean toward taking a quarter percent.” The next question from the floor followed as naturally as water rushing over a cliff: Why do you need to take the money at all? Rather than attempt an incomplete and half-hearted explanation to the people gathered in the room, ostensibly fold out why they were to be subjected to further taxation, Dussinger referred to a list of five main areas township officials had agreed were the prime reasons that taking the wage tax percentage was now undo* serious consideration. Why Money Needed Point 1: Supervisors are looking forward to the possible loss of revenue sharing funds from the state. Although they now believe that revenue sharing will be re-enacted they noted that the $2»,000 received would be used entirely for the operation of the Warwick Township police department. Point 2: The township has a commitment to its own municipal sewer authority and to the borough of Lititz to support the reconstruction of a sewer plant if the funds are not available when construction begins. This means, according to the supervisors, that they would have to borrow $177,000 to back up the now all but fundless township sewer authority. In fact, the only money coming into the authority at this time is about $100 per month from a water system that runs just into the periphery of the township. The authority has no means of generating income until the Lititz sewer system has been expanded and township residents have hooked on. Then, and only then, will the money start coming in, via hook-up charges (estimated by supervisors at $700 now with an additional 16 percent escalation cost per year) and annual sewage bills estimated as high as $300 to $350 per household. Said the supervisors, certain areas of the township have been designated by the Department of Environmental Resources for sewage, and the township * must go along with those demands. They explained that the costs of sewage hook-up. and yearly use are not excessive in the light of a sewer authority’s need to cover the cost of the system as well as to establish a 10 percent sinking fund for repair costs. Point 3: Warwick Township supervisors recently have become concerned about the inability of the Rothsville Fire Co. to support itself and pay a large debt on the new fire station - meeting hall. Supervisors agree that negotiations for a loan for the fire company must be initiated soon in order to keep the volunteer organization from succumbing to economic collapse. Supervisors noted that in addition to the large debt, the company faces a need for funds to replace the fire fighting apparatus presently used. Said DuSsinger, the problem is that when a volunteer fire department runs into money problems there’s a chance the firemen may become discouraged, leaving the township to hire firemen. Point 4: There is a specific need in the township to Improve services to residents by increasing the, work staff. At present, there is no paid township secretary. Most of the township clerical business is taken care of by Richard Hoffer, secretary-treasurer of the board of. supervisors. Point 5: The final point of (Continued on Page 2] i.... A crew of cameramen from Atlanta, Georgia, visited Lititz recently in connection with a Commonwealth National Bank ad in the making. The crew asked people along Main S tre e ts verbalize utitz Record Sxpxeia Photo their ideas about good banking service while being filmed. The men remarked that Lititz was one of the most unique and attractive towns they had ever seen in their filming travels. Film Crew Visits Main Street The borough of Lititz was visited by a camera crew from Atlanta, Georgia, recently during the filming of a Commonwealth National Bank advertisement to be aired on television in late summer. Palkovic Named Sports Editor of Lititz Record Road, joins the Record Express staff this week as sports editor. A long-time resident of this area, Palkovic is widely known for his activities as a wrestling and football referee. He was founder of the Lancaster Wrestling Officals Assn., of which he is secretary-treasurer, and for 16 years has been chairman of the awards committee for tiie outstanding lineman and back in the Lancaster- Lebanon Football League, an award he helped establish. He is also president of the Football Officials Assn. This year he was named Outstanding Football Official by the Lancaster- Lebanon League. Palkovic has been active in sports since his high, school days. At Lebanon High School, he was on the football, baseball, basketball and track teams, and at Millersville State College, he wrestled and was on the baseball and football teams. A guidance counselor at Steve Palkovic Warwick High School, he formerly taught math and science at Lebanon Catholic High School and Manheim Township High School. He also coached football, wrestling, and golf at Manheim Township. In addition to his referee work, he is a golfer, and has his private pilot’s license. Palkovic is married and has two children. He is a past president of the Lititz Lions Club, a member of the church council of St. James Catholic Church, and is in charge of adult education in Warwick School District. The Atlanta-based crew is part if a company called the Great American Bank C a m p i i g n s , i w h ic h specializes in filming commercials *nr banks., Carolyn North t i the Harrisburg Commonwealti National Bank had accompanied the crew in a public relations capacity. She told the Record that the crew had been in Lancaster earlier in the day and had come into Lititz for afternoon filming of on-the-street interviews with Commonwealth customers and non-customers alike. She said it was the first time the men had seen the town and that they were all taken with its physical beauty and its well-p r e s e rv e d h i s to r ic a l character. In fact, she quoted them as telling her they thought its uniqueness made it one of the most attractive towns they had ever visited during their filming travels. The bank campaign consists of many on-the-street interviews with people from the six-county area served by the bank’s 42 branches. Carolyn had been with the crew for most of the interviews and said she was quite impressed with the way they handled the informal on-the-spot question and answer sessions. She said the men worked without scripts, relying instead on a few questions to prompt comments from the people about what they expect from a bank. Although they will be using only about half of the filmed interviews in the televised presentations, the crew spent several hours walking up and down Main Street asking strollers and shoppers to take part in the in-erviews. Their friendly &)proach charmed a number of Lititz. residents into becone temporary TV stars. The commercials will be Shown over he six-county area served by Commonwealth sometime in August or September. These counties include Lancaster, Lebanon, York, Cumberland, Dauphin, and Perry. In this issue Business Directory 20 Church News 18 Classified Ads 22,23 Editorial Page 4 Sports Section 6,7 Women’s 12,13 WE’VE HELD THE LINE SINCE 1966! However, effective with the May 6 issue the single copy price of the Lititz Record Express will be 15 cents. A one year subscription within Lancaster County will be $5.00. This increase is necessary because of substantial increases in postage, newsprint and other production costs. Walker Leads Congressional Race in 16th District Robert S. Walker from East Petersburg, the candidate endorsed by C o n g re ssm an Edwin Eshelman for the 16th Congressional District seat that Eshelman is vaqating, appeared to have won the l i man race that has held the c o u n t y ’ s a t t e n t i o n throughout the primary campaign. At press time, the paper ballot votes from Chester County were not reported, but Walker was ahead elsewhere by more than 1,000 votes. However, in Lititz borough, Marvin Miller got tiie most votes, in Warwick Township, Miller and Darvin Boyd were top vote getters, and in Elizabeth Township, Boyd got the most votes. State Representative Nick Moehlmann, unchallenged on the Republican ticket, will be the GOP candidate in the fall election, and Douglas G. Stauffer, also unchallenged, will be the Democratic candidate tor the House seat. In the race for the nominations for the U.S. Robert Walker Senate seat held by Hugh Scott for almost 20 years, John Heinz from Allegheny County won the Republican n o m i n a t i o n a n d Congressman Bill Green of Philadelphia won the Democratic nomination. The former Georgia governor, Jimmy Carter, got the nod for Democratic candidate for President across the state and in Lancaster County. President Gerald Ford was unchallenged in the Pennsylvania primary for the Republican nomination. v In local balloting for committee persons, the following were elected: Lititz Boro, First Ward, 1st Precinct — Paul Diehm and Nancy Wolfe; 2nd Precinct — Gordon Trump; Second Ward, 1st Precinct — Allen Eshelman and Nancy Workman; 2nd Precinct — Gerry Husser and Deb Smith; Third Ward, 1st Precinct — Paul McCloud and Mary Carl; 2nd Precinct — Wayne Hummer and Carol Ruth. Elizabeth Township — Leroy Ulrich and Barbara Lederer Darlington. Warwick — Rothsville — Vincent J. Fauci and Mrs. Robert Wohlson; Warwick Brunnerville — Dean Baublitz; Warwick Kissel Hill - Richard K. Walter and Nancy Brenner. Voter turnout in this area ran over the 50 percent mark, committee officials Rep. Nick Moehlmann reported, one of the highest primary turnouts in years. Nancy Brenner, who is beginning her second term as committee woman in the Kissel Hill District, told the Record that the vote count took about an hour longer than usual in her district because there were so many write-in votes. Most of the write-ins weren’t “serious,” she said. One person didn’t vote for any of the listed candidates but instead wrote in all the names of the Philadelphia Flyers hockey team. “I can’t imagine anyone taking the time to come out and vote and then doing something like that,” she commented. Breakdown in votes for Congressman is: Walker - 170 in Lititz Boro, 126 In Warwick Twp., 31 in Elizabeth Twp. Miller—460 in Lititz Boro; 251 in Warwick Twp.; 32 in Elizabeth Twp. Armodt — 18 in Lititz Boro; 21 in Warwick Twp.; 4 in Elizabeth Twp. Mohler—72 in Utitz Boro; 27 in Warwick Twp.; 3 in Elizabeth Twp. Boyd —165 in Utitz Boro; 272 in Warwick TVp.; 65 in Elizabeth Twp. Durry — 83 in Utitz Boro; 118 in Warwick Twp.; 41 in Elizabeth Twp. Mearig—49 in Utitz Boro; Alternatives By Peggy Fralley Utitz Boro Council members are divided over whether or not the borough should follow suit if Warwick Township claims a portion of the wage tax within the next two weeks —a portion that now goes to the school district—but there was no doubt at Tuesday night’s Council meeting that local officials are worried about the situation. Council President Jim Yerger said he would stand ready to call Council into a special session if Warwick Township makes a move before May 15, the deadline for filing an application to take a share of the earned income tax. Assistant Boro Manager Curt Amidon proposed as a possible alternative that the three municipalities involved — the borough and Warwick and Elizabeth Townships — each take a portion of the real estate transfer tax instead, and agreed to make this proposal to Warwick Township supervisors. Amidon calculated that this tax would give Warwick Township approximately $90,000, enough to help them through their financial bind, he thought. Councilmen thrashed over the issue for nearly an hour Tuesday night, in the wake of a recent joint meeting with the township in which the Warwick supervisors stated they needed the added revenue to help pay for increasing costs, which they said was primarily brought on by the approaching hookup with the Lititz sewer system. “We are forced to take it (the wage tax) whether you like it or not,” Council President Jim Yerger stated flatly during the discussion of how the borough will react if the township decides to file for the wage tax this spring. He also objected to the township citing the pending sewer hookup as its main cause for financial problems, stating that the real problem was the fact that the township has too low a tax rate, five mills, and is also facing a major financial problem with the Rothsville Fire Company. Councilman Wendel Hower did not agree that the borough would have to take the tax. Rather he insisted that the borough should NOT take its permitted half percent of the wage tax, or $75,000, regardless of what the township does. Hower maintained that the borough budget is already set for the year, that the borough does not need the extra $75,000 right now. He said it would be better to live with the possible “inequality” that may develop within the school district than to make a claim on money it doesn’t need and drive school district taxes up even further. He proposed as an alternative that the school district take only a half percent of the wage tax from each municipality in the district, and thus eliminate the need for Lititz borough to claim its half percent, and have the extra $75,000 on its hands. Councilman Donald Stauffer, on the other hand, said that the borough should take its permitted share of the tax if the township does, and insisted that Boro Council be ready on short notice to file a claim for the tax if Warwick Township does so before May 15. 59 in Warwick Twp.; 10 in Elizabeth Twp. Krank—6 in lititz Boro; 5 in Warwick Twp.; 0 in Elizabeth Twp. Baxter—7 in lititz Boro; 3 in Warwick Twp.; 0 on Elizabeth Twp. Scott — 92 in lititz Boro; 76 in Warwick Twp.; 22 in Elizabeth Twp. Lewis — 96 in lititz Boro; 40 in Warwick Twp.; 4 in Elizabeth Twp. bt-Semce Day The May in-service education program for teachers which Warwick School District had scheduled for Monday, May 3 has been moved to Monday, May 10. High school students will be dismissed at 12:30 p.m., middle school students, at 12:35 p.m., and elementary students, at 1:10 p.m. There will be no afternoon kindergarten classes that day. . Front Street, 5-Points May Be Rebuilt in ’78 The notorious intersection of Front and Cedar Streets in the north end of the borough, known as Five Points, may be in for some long-needed changes. Boro Council gave a tentative nod Tuesday night to an $87,000 reconstruction project for Front Street, between Broad and Cedar, and passed a motion to notify property owners on Front Street that it intends to start the job in 1978, and that the property owners will be responsible for paying the cost of their own curbing and sidewalk. The cost estimate was compiled by Huth Engineers, and does not include the costs that must be borne by individual property owners or the cost of any new storm drainage system at Front and Cedar. Councilman indicated that by 1978 the overall cost to the borough alone may be over the $100,000 mark. A main concern, as pointed out by Huth Engineers, are trees that protrude onto the road and damage curb and sidewalk. Council will be faced with deciding the fate of these trees. ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Boro to Put Up Matching Funds lor Sertoma Park A plan to build a pavilion and walkways through the Locust Street Park this summer, presented by the Lititz Sertoma Club to Boro Council Tuesday night, drew enthusiastic approval and an offer to match any money that the club puts into the project with matching borough funds, up to $2500. Council also approved naming the park “Sertoma Park.” The park land is owned by the borough, but its upkeep and improvements have been a project of the Sertoma Club for a number of years. Club President, Harold McKinney,, told Council that the Sertomans have a little over $2,000 to spend on the project this year. The club wants to build & 20 by 40 foot pavilion in an area behind the pumping station, and put in asphalt walkways. As a long range project, the club also wants to put foot bridges over the stream, to give easy access to both sides of the park. They anticipate the total project will cost about $3500, not including trees and shrubbery they want to plant. WhenTftdKinney available to use on the project, Councilman Bill York, commending the club on its willingness to put its own funds into the park, suggested that $2500 now held in escrow for parks be used as matching funds. This motion passed unanimously. V
Object Description
Title | Lititz Record Express |
Masthead | Lititz Record Express 1976-04-29 |
Subject | Lititz (Pa.) -- Newspapers;Lancaster County (Pa.)—Newspapers |
Description | Lititz newspapers 1877-2001 |
Publisher | Record Print. Co. |
Date | 1976-04-29 |
Location Covered | United States;Pennsylvania;Lancaster County (Pa.);Lititz (Pa.);Warwick (Lancaster County, Pa. : Township) |
Type | Text |
Original Format | Newspapers |
Digital Format | application/pdf |
Identifier | 04_29_1976.pdf |
Language | English |
Rights | Steinman Enterprises |
Contact | For information on source and images, contact LancasterHistory, Attn: Library Services, 230 N. President Ave., Lancaster, PA, 17603. Phone: 717-392-4633, ext. 126. Email: research@lancasterhistory.org |
Contributing Institution | LancasterHistory |
Sponsorship | This Digital Object is provided in a collection that is included in POWER Library: Pennsylvania Photos and Documents, which is funded by the Office of Commonwealth Libraries of Pennsylvania/Pennsylvania Department of Education. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subject | Lititz (Pa.) -- Newspapers;Lancaster County (Pa.)—Newspapers |
Location Covered | United States;Pennsylvania;Lancaster County (Pa.);Lititz (Pa.);Warwick (Lancaster County, Pa. : Township) |
Type | Text |
Original Format | Newspapers |
Digital Format | application/pdf |
Language | English |
Contact | For information on source and images, contact LancasterHistory, Attn: Library Services, 230 N. President Ave., Lancaster, PA, 17603. Phone: 717-392-4633, ext. 126. Email: research@lancasterhistory.org |
Contributing Institution | LancasterHistory |
Sponsorship | This Digital Object is provided in a collection that is included in POWER Library: Pennsylvania Photos and Documents, which is funded by the Office of Commonwealth Libraries of Pennsylvania/Pennsylvania Department of Education. |
Full Text | w.' '■¿■■".-rv’ ••‘iMS’1.- /; ; >^r _ • U M4VWV «■w* - «% -u jv^-t1 ii.t,u. 1'juiLuMwmj!1 e:: 11'i^iin iptipiÿiiipi T H E B E S S SERVING THE WARWICK AREA FOR NEARLY A CENTURY 100th Year ESTABLISHED APRIL, 1877, AS THE SUNBEAM I CONSOLIDATED WITH THE LITITZ RECORD, 1937) Lititz, Lancaster County, PA 17543, Thursday, April 29,1976 10 CENTS A COPT; $4.00 PER TEAR BT MAIL WITHIN LANCASTER COUNTT 24 PAGES-No. 6 Warwick Twp. Still On Fence Over Wage Tax : ? T ^ r A ’ H i ' ' 1 * } . *1. ¡ m ! f S i ' E S « I S S S 5 By Bonnie Szymanski The bimonthly meeting of the Warwick Township supervisors had been in session only twenty minutes Thursday night when one of the several citizens gathered in the township municipal building asked the question that was on everyone’s mind: What is the township supervisors’ opinion of taking one hall of the one percent wage tax from the school district? And more to the point: What action is being taken at this time? Although the wage tax question had been scheduled for discussion later in the evening under new business, tiie supervisors willingly set aside protocol and opened the floor to discussion of the wage tax controversy. “First of all,” explained Bill Dusslnger, chairman of the board of supervisors, “we haven’t decided on the full one half percent; we lean toward taking a quarter percent.” The next question from the floor followed as naturally as water rushing over a cliff: Why do you need to take the money at all? Rather than attempt an incomplete and half-hearted explanation to the people gathered in the room, ostensibly fold out why they were to be subjected to further taxation, Dussinger referred to a list of five main areas township officials had agreed were the prime reasons that taking the wage tax percentage was now undo* serious consideration. Why Money Needed Point 1: Supervisors are looking forward to the possible loss of revenue sharing funds from the state. Although they now believe that revenue sharing will be re-enacted they noted that the $2»,000 received would be used entirely for the operation of the Warwick Township police department. Point 2: The township has a commitment to its own municipal sewer authority and to the borough of Lititz to support the reconstruction of a sewer plant if the funds are not available when construction begins. This means, according to the supervisors, that they would have to borrow $177,000 to back up the now all but fundless township sewer authority. In fact, the only money coming into the authority at this time is about $100 per month from a water system that runs just into the periphery of the township. The authority has no means of generating income until the Lititz sewer system has been expanded and township residents have hooked on. Then, and only then, will the money start coming in, via hook-up charges (estimated by supervisors at $700 now with an additional 16 percent escalation cost per year) and annual sewage bills estimated as high as $300 to $350 per household. Said the supervisors, certain areas of the township have been designated by the Department of Environmental Resources for sewage, and the township * must go along with those demands. They explained that the costs of sewage hook-up. and yearly use are not excessive in the light of a sewer authority’s need to cover the cost of the system as well as to establish a 10 percent sinking fund for repair costs. Point 3: Warwick Township supervisors recently have become concerned about the inability of the Rothsville Fire Co. to support itself and pay a large debt on the new fire station - meeting hall. Supervisors agree that negotiations for a loan for the fire company must be initiated soon in order to keep the volunteer organization from succumbing to economic collapse. Supervisors noted that in addition to the large debt, the company faces a need for funds to replace the fire fighting apparatus presently used. Said DuSsinger, the problem is that when a volunteer fire department runs into money problems there’s a chance the firemen may become discouraged, leaving the township to hire firemen. Point 4: There is a specific need in the township to Improve services to residents by increasing the, work staff. At present, there is no paid township secretary. Most of the township clerical business is taken care of by Richard Hoffer, secretary-treasurer of the board of. supervisors. Point 5: The final point of (Continued on Page 2] i.... A crew of cameramen from Atlanta, Georgia, visited Lititz recently in connection with a Commonwealth National Bank ad in the making. The crew asked people along Main S tre e ts verbalize utitz Record Sxpxeia Photo their ideas about good banking service while being filmed. The men remarked that Lititz was one of the most unique and attractive towns they had ever seen in their filming travels. Film Crew Visits Main Street The borough of Lititz was visited by a camera crew from Atlanta, Georgia, recently during the filming of a Commonwealth National Bank advertisement to be aired on television in late summer. Palkovic Named Sports Editor of Lititz Record Road, joins the Record Express staff this week as sports editor. A long-time resident of this area, Palkovic is widely known for his activities as a wrestling and football referee. He was founder of the Lancaster Wrestling Officals Assn., of which he is secretary-treasurer, and for 16 years has been chairman of the awards committee for tiie outstanding lineman and back in the Lancaster- Lebanon Football League, an award he helped establish. He is also president of the Football Officials Assn. This year he was named Outstanding Football Official by the Lancaster- Lebanon League. Palkovic has been active in sports since his high, school days. At Lebanon High School, he was on the football, baseball, basketball and track teams, and at Millersville State College, he wrestled and was on the baseball and football teams. A guidance counselor at Steve Palkovic Warwick High School, he formerly taught math and science at Lebanon Catholic High School and Manheim Township High School. He also coached football, wrestling, and golf at Manheim Township. In addition to his referee work, he is a golfer, and has his private pilot’s license. Palkovic is married and has two children. He is a past president of the Lititz Lions Club, a member of the church council of St. James Catholic Church, and is in charge of adult education in Warwick School District. The Atlanta-based crew is part if a company called the Great American Bank C a m p i i g n s , i w h ic h specializes in filming commercials *nr banks., Carolyn North t i the Harrisburg Commonwealti National Bank had accompanied the crew in a public relations capacity. She told the Record that the crew had been in Lancaster earlier in the day and had come into Lititz for afternoon filming of on-the-street interviews with Commonwealth customers and non-customers alike. She said it was the first time the men had seen the town and that they were all taken with its physical beauty and its well-p r e s e rv e d h i s to r ic a l character. In fact, she quoted them as telling her they thought its uniqueness made it one of the most attractive towns they had ever visited during their filming travels. The bank campaign consists of many on-the-street interviews with people from the six-county area served by the bank’s 42 branches. Carolyn had been with the crew for most of the interviews and said she was quite impressed with the way they handled the informal on-the-spot question and answer sessions. She said the men worked without scripts, relying instead on a few questions to prompt comments from the people about what they expect from a bank. Although they will be using only about half of the filmed interviews in the televised presentations, the crew spent several hours walking up and down Main Street asking strollers and shoppers to take part in the in-erviews. Their friendly &)proach charmed a number of Lititz. residents into becone temporary TV stars. The commercials will be Shown over he six-county area served by Commonwealth sometime in August or September. These counties include Lancaster, Lebanon, York, Cumberland, Dauphin, and Perry. In this issue Business Directory 20 Church News 18 Classified Ads 22,23 Editorial Page 4 Sports Section 6,7 Women’s 12,13 WE’VE HELD THE LINE SINCE 1966! However, effective with the May 6 issue the single copy price of the Lititz Record Express will be 15 cents. A one year subscription within Lancaster County will be $5.00. This increase is necessary because of substantial increases in postage, newsprint and other production costs. Walker Leads Congressional Race in 16th District Robert S. Walker from East Petersburg, the candidate endorsed by C o n g re ssm an Edwin Eshelman for the 16th Congressional District seat that Eshelman is vaqating, appeared to have won the l i man race that has held the c o u n t y ’ s a t t e n t i o n throughout the primary campaign. At press time, the paper ballot votes from Chester County were not reported, but Walker was ahead elsewhere by more than 1,000 votes. However, in Lititz borough, Marvin Miller got tiie most votes, in Warwick Township, Miller and Darvin Boyd were top vote getters, and in Elizabeth Township, Boyd got the most votes. State Representative Nick Moehlmann, unchallenged on the Republican ticket, will be the GOP candidate in the fall election, and Douglas G. Stauffer, also unchallenged, will be the Democratic candidate tor the House seat. In the race for the nominations for the U.S. Robert Walker Senate seat held by Hugh Scott for almost 20 years, John Heinz from Allegheny County won the Republican n o m i n a t i o n a n d Congressman Bill Green of Philadelphia won the Democratic nomination. The former Georgia governor, Jimmy Carter, got the nod for Democratic candidate for President across the state and in Lancaster County. President Gerald Ford was unchallenged in the Pennsylvania primary for the Republican nomination. v In local balloting for committee persons, the following were elected: Lititz Boro, First Ward, 1st Precinct — Paul Diehm and Nancy Wolfe; 2nd Precinct — Gordon Trump; Second Ward, 1st Precinct — Allen Eshelman and Nancy Workman; 2nd Precinct — Gerry Husser and Deb Smith; Third Ward, 1st Precinct — Paul McCloud and Mary Carl; 2nd Precinct — Wayne Hummer and Carol Ruth. Elizabeth Township — Leroy Ulrich and Barbara Lederer Darlington. Warwick — Rothsville — Vincent J. Fauci and Mrs. Robert Wohlson; Warwick Brunnerville — Dean Baublitz; Warwick Kissel Hill - Richard K. Walter and Nancy Brenner. Voter turnout in this area ran over the 50 percent mark, committee officials Rep. Nick Moehlmann reported, one of the highest primary turnouts in years. Nancy Brenner, who is beginning her second term as committee woman in the Kissel Hill District, told the Record that the vote count took about an hour longer than usual in her district because there were so many write-in votes. Most of the write-ins weren’t “serious,” she said. One person didn’t vote for any of the listed candidates but instead wrote in all the names of the Philadelphia Flyers hockey team. “I can’t imagine anyone taking the time to come out and vote and then doing something like that,” she commented. Breakdown in votes for Congressman is: Walker - 170 in Lititz Boro, 126 In Warwick Twp., 31 in Elizabeth Twp. Miller—460 in Lititz Boro; 251 in Warwick Twp.; 32 in Elizabeth Twp. Armodt — 18 in Lititz Boro; 21 in Warwick Twp.; 4 in Elizabeth Twp. Mohler—72 in Utitz Boro; 27 in Warwick Twp.; 3 in Elizabeth Twp. Boyd —165 in Utitz Boro; 272 in Warwick TVp.; 65 in Elizabeth Twp. Durry — 83 in Utitz Boro; 118 in Warwick Twp.; 41 in Elizabeth Twp. Mearig—49 in Utitz Boro; Alternatives By Peggy Fralley Utitz Boro Council members are divided over whether or not the borough should follow suit if Warwick Township claims a portion of the wage tax within the next two weeks —a portion that now goes to the school district—but there was no doubt at Tuesday night’s Council meeting that local officials are worried about the situation. Council President Jim Yerger said he would stand ready to call Council into a special session if Warwick Township makes a move before May 15, the deadline for filing an application to take a share of the earned income tax. Assistant Boro Manager Curt Amidon proposed as a possible alternative that the three municipalities involved — the borough and Warwick and Elizabeth Townships — each take a portion of the real estate transfer tax instead, and agreed to make this proposal to Warwick Township supervisors. Amidon calculated that this tax would give Warwick Township approximately $90,000, enough to help them through their financial bind, he thought. Councilmen thrashed over the issue for nearly an hour Tuesday night, in the wake of a recent joint meeting with the township in which the Warwick supervisors stated they needed the added revenue to help pay for increasing costs, which they said was primarily brought on by the approaching hookup with the Lititz sewer system. “We are forced to take it (the wage tax) whether you like it or not,” Council President Jim Yerger stated flatly during the discussion of how the borough will react if the township decides to file for the wage tax this spring. He also objected to the township citing the pending sewer hookup as its main cause for financial problems, stating that the real problem was the fact that the township has too low a tax rate, five mills, and is also facing a major financial problem with the Rothsville Fire Company. Councilman Wendel Hower did not agree that the borough would have to take the tax. Rather he insisted that the borough should NOT take its permitted half percent of the wage tax, or $75,000, regardless of what the township does. Hower maintained that the borough budget is already set for the year, that the borough does not need the extra $75,000 right now. He said it would be better to live with the possible “inequality” that may develop within the school district than to make a claim on money it doesn’t need and drive school district taxes up even further. He proposed as an alternative that the school district take only a half percent of the wage tax from each municipality in the district, and thus eliminate the need for Lititz borough to claim its half percent, and have the extra $75,000 on its hands. Councilman Donald Stauffer, on the other hand, said that the borough should take its permitted share of the tax if the township does, and insisted that Boro Council be ready on short notice to file a claim for the tax if Warwick Township does so before May 15. 59 in Warwick Twp.; 10 in Elizabeth Twp. Krank—6 in lititz Boro; 5 in Warwick Twp.; 0 in Elizabeth Twp. Baxter—7 in lititz Boro; 3 in Warwick Twp.; 0 on Elizabeth Twp. Scott — 92 in lititz Boro; 76 in Warwick Twp.; 22 in Elizabeth Twp. Lewis — 96 in lititz Boro; 40 in Warwick Twp.; 4 in Elizabeth Twp. bt-Semce Day The May in-service education program for teachers which Warwick School District had scheduled for Monday, May 3 has been moved to Monday, May 10. High school students will be dismissed at 12:30 p.m., middle school students, at 12:35 p.m., and elementary students, at 1:10 p.m. There will be no afternoon kindergarten classes that day. . Front Street, 5-Points May Be Rebuilt in ’78 The notorious intersection of Front and Cedar Streets in the north end of the borough, known as Five Points, may be in for some long-needed changes. Boro Council gave a tentative nod Tuesday night to an $87,000 reconstruction project for Front Street, between Broad and Cedar, and passed a motion to notify property owners on Front Street that it intends to start the job in 1978, and that the property owners will be responsible for paying the cost of their own curbing and sidewalk. The cost estimate was compiled by Huth Engineers, and does not include the costs that must be borne by individual property owners or the cost of any new storm drainage system at Front and Cedar. Councilman indicated that by 1978 the overall cost to the borough alone may be over the $100,000 mark. A main concern, as pointed out by Huth Engineers, are trees that protrude onto the road and damage curb and sidewalk. Council will be faced with deciding the fate of these trees. ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Boro to Put Up Matching Funds lor Sertoma Park A plan to build a pavilion and walkways through the Locust Street Park this summer, presented by the Lititz Sertoma Club to Boro Council Tuesday night, drew enthusiastic approval and an offer to match any money that the club puts into the project with matching borough funds, up to $2500. Council also approved naming the park “Sertoma Park.” The park land is owned by the borough, but its upkeep and improvements have been a project of the Sertoma Club for a number of years. Club President, Harold McKinney,, told Council that the Sertomans have a little over $2,000 to spend on the project this year. The club wants to build & 20 by 40 foot pavilion in an area behind the pumping station, and put in asphalt walkways. As a long range project, the club also wants to put foot bridges over the stream, to give easy access to both sides of the park. They anticipate the total project will cost about $3500, not including trees and shrubbery they want to plant. WhenTftdKinney available to use on the project, Councilman Bill York, commending the club on its willingness to put its own funds into the park, suggested that $2500 now held in escrow for parks be used as matching funds. This motion passed unanimously. V |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1